Use of nanomaterials for the immobilization of industrially important enzymes
Abstract
Immobilization enables enzymes to be held in place so that they can be easily separated from the product when needed and can be used again. Conventional methods of immobilization include adsorption, encapsulation, entrapment, cross linking and covalent binding. However, conventional methods have several drawbacks including reduced stability, loss of biomolecules, less enzyme loading or activity and limited diffusion. The aim of this study is the evaluation of importance of nanomaterials for the immobilization of industrially important enzymes. Nano materials are now in trend for the immobilization of different enzymes due to their physiochemical properties. Gold nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, nano diamonds, graphene, carbon nanotubes and others are used for immobilization. Among covalent and non-covalent immobilization of enzymes involving both single and multiwalled carbon nanotubes, non-covalent immobilization with functionalized carbon nanotubes is superior. Therefore, enzymes immobilized with nanomaterials possess greater stability, retention of catalytic activity and reusability of enzymes.
Downloads
References
2. Hiteshi K, Chauhan S, Gupta R. Immobilization of microbial pectinases: a review. CIBTech J Biotechnol. 2013; 2: 37-52.
3. Cerreti M, Markošová K, Esti M, Rosenberg M, Rebroš M. Immobilisation of pectinases into PVA gel for fruit juice application. Int J Food. 2017; 52(2): 531-539.
4. Kalieva A, Saduyeva Z, Suleimenova Z, Mustafin K. Cell immobilization of Aspergillus niger for enhanced production of phytase. Cell. 2017; 5: 48-50.
5. Cannella D, Jørgensen H. Do new cellulolytic enzyme preparations affect the industrial strategies for high solids lignocellulosic ethanol production? Biotechnol Bioengin. 2014; 111: 59.
6. Sharma S, Kanwar SS. Organic solvent tolerant lipases and applications. Scient World J. 2014: ID 625258.
7. Verma ML, Puri M, Barrow CJ. Recent trends in nanomaterials immobilised enzymes for biofuel production. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016; 36: 108-119.
8. Martín MC, de Ambrosini VIM. Cold-active acid pectinolytic system from psychrotolerant Bacillus: Color extraction from red grape skin. Am J Enol Viticult. 2013: 13002.
9. Tamer MT, Omer A, Hassan M. Methods of Enzyme Immobilization. 2016; vol 7.
10. Cesarini S, Infanzón B, Pastor FJ, Diaz P. Fast and economic immobilization methods described for non-commercial Pseudomonas lipases. BMC Biotechnol. 2014; 14: 27.
11. Nisha S, Karthick SA, Gobi N. A review on methods, application and properties of immobilized enzyme. Chem Sci Rev Lett. 2012; 1: 148-155.
12. Nguyen HH, Kim M. An Overview of Techniques in Enzyme Immobilization. Appl Sci Converg Technol. 2017; 26: 157-163.
13. Singh S, Jain D, Singla M. Sol-gel based composite of gold nanoparticles as matix for tyrosinase for amperometric catechol biosensor. Sensors Actuators B: Chemical. 2013; 182: 161-169.
14. Putzbach W, Ronkainen NJ. Immobilization techniques in the fabrication of nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors: A review. Sensors. 2013; 13: 4811-4840.
15. Chawla S, Pundir CS. An electrochemical biosensor for fructosyl valine for glycosylated hemoglobin detection based on core-shell magnetic bionanoparticles modified gold electrode. Biosensors Bioelectr. 2011; 26: 3438-3443.
16. Dong S, Peng L, Wei W, Huang T. Three MOF-Templated Carbon Nanocomposites for Potential Platforms of Enzyme Immobilization with Improved Electrochemical Performance. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2018; 10: 14665-14672.
17. Gupta MN, Kaloti M, Kapoor M, Solanki K. Nanomaterials as matrices for enzyme immobilization. Artif Cells Blood Substitutes Biotechnol. 2011; 39: 98-109.
18. Feng W, Ji P. Enzymes immobilized on carbon nanotubes. Biotechnol Adv. 2011; 29: 889-895.
19. Hausmann NZ, Minteer SD, Baum DA. Controlled placement of enzymes on carbon nanotubes using comb-branched DNA. J Electrochem Soc. 2014; 161: H3001-H3004.
20. Min K, Yoo YJ. Recent progress in nanobiocatalysis for enzyme immobilization and its application. Biotechnol Bioprocess Engin. 2014; 19: 553-567.
21. Goh WJ, Makam VS, Hu J, Kang L, Zheng M, Yoong SL, et al. Iron oxide filled magnetic carbon nanotube-enzyme conjugates for recycling of amyloglucosidase: toward useful applications in biofuel production process. Langmuir. 2012; 28: 16864-16873.
22. Saifuddin N, Raziah AZ, Junizah AR. Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Structure and Their Interaction with Proteins. J Chem. 2013: 1-18.
23. Liu W, Wang L, Jiang R. Specific enzyme immobilization approaches and their application with nanomaterials. Topics Catalysis. 2012; 55: 1146-1156.
24. Karachevtsev V, Glamazda AY, Zarudnev E, Karachevtsev M, Leontiev V, Linnik A, et al. Glucose oxidase immobilization onto carbon nanotube networking. arXiv. 2012: 12082837.
25. Pedrosa VA, Paliwal S, Balasubramanian S, Nepal D, Davis V, Wild J, et al. Enhanced stability of enzyme organophosphate hydrolase interfaced on the carbon nanotubes. Colloids Surf B Biointerf. 2010; 77: 69-74.
26. Antonucci A, Kupis-Rozmyslowicz J, Boghossian AA. Noncovalent Protein and Peptide Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Biodelivery and Optical Sensing Applications. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2017; 9: 11321-11331.
27. Georgiev YN, Ognyanov MH, Kussovski VK, Kratchanova MG. Pectinolytic enzymes – application for studying and preparation of immunomodulating pectic polysaccharides from fruits, vegetables and medicinal plants. A review. Conference: „food science, engineering and technologies – 2013“ 18-19 October 2013.
28. Liu X, Jiang Y, Yang S, Meng X, Song X, Wu M. Effects of Pectinase Treatment on Pulping Properties and the Morphology and Structure of Bagasse Fiber. BioResour. 2017; 12: 7731-7743.
29. Kumari A, Kaila P, Tiwari P, Singh V, Kaul S, Singhal N, Guptasarma P. Multiple thermostable enzyme hydrolases on magnetic nanoparticles: An immobilized enzyme-mediated approach to saccharification through simultaneous xylanase, cellulase and amylolytic glucanotransferase action. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018; 120: 1650-1658.
30. Nicolau E, Méndez J, Fonseca JJ, Griebenow K, Cabrera CR. Bioelectrochemistry of non-covalent immobilized alcohol dehydrogenase on oxidized diamond nanoparticles. Bioelectrochem. 2012; 85: 1-6.
31. Singh P, Gupta P, Singh R, Sharma R. Activity and stability of immobilized alpha- amylase produced by Bacillus acidocaldarius. Int J Pharm Life Sci. 2012: 3.
32. Mohamad NR, Marzuki NHC, Buang NA, Huyop F, Wahab RA. An overview of technologies for immobilization of enzymes and surface analysis techniques for immobilized enzymes. Biotechnol Biotechnolog Equip. 2015; 29: 205-220.
33. Cao L, van Rantwijk F, Sheldon RA. Cross- linked enzyme aggregates: a simple and effective method for the immobilization of penicillin acylase. Organic Lett. 2000; 2: 1361- 1364.
34. Cipolatti EP, Silva MJA, Klein M, Feddern V, Feltes MMC, Oliveira JV, et al. Current status and trends in enzymatic nanoimmobilization. J Mol Catalysis B: Enzymatic. 2014; 99: 56-67.
35. Guncheva M, Dimitrov M, Zhiryakova D. Novel nanostructured tin dioxide as promising carrier for Candida rugosa lipase. Process Biochem. 2011; 46: 2170-2177.
36. Kim H, Lee I, Kwon Y, Kim BC, Ha S, Lee J-h, Kim J. Immobilization of glucose oxidase into polyaniline nano-fiber matrix for biofuel cell applications. Biosensors Bioelectr. 2011; 26: 3908-3913.
37. Petkova GA, Záruba К, Žvátora P, Král V. Gold and silver nanoparticles for biomolecule immobilization and enzymatic catalysis. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012; 7: 287.
38. Keighron JD, Keating CD. Enzyme: nanoparticle bioconjugates with two sequential enzymes: stoichiometry and activity of malate dehydrogenase and citrate synthase on Au nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2010; 26: 18992-190001.
39. Rao CR, Govindaraj A. Nanotubes and nanowires. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2011; vol 18.
40. Park J, Kwon K, Kim S-H, Yi M-H, Zhang E, Kong G, et al. Astrocytic phosphorylation of PDK1 on Tyr9 following an excitotoxic lesion in the mouse hippocampus. Brain Res. 2013; 1533: 37-43.
41. Shibakami M, Tsubouchi G, Nakamura M, Hayashi M. Polysaccharide nano-fiber made from euglenoid alga. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013; 93: 499-505.
42. Ji P, Tan H, Xu X, Feng W. Lipase covalently attached to multiwalled carbon nanotubes as an efficient catalyst in organic solvent. AIChE J. 2010; 56: 3005-3011.
43. Gokhale AA, Lu J, Lee I. Immobilization of cellulase on magnetoresponsive graphene nano-supports. J Mol Catalysis B: Enzymatic. 2013; 90: 76-86.
44. Zhou L, Jiang Y, Gao J, Zhao X, Ma L, Zhou Q. Oriented immobilization of glucose oxidase on graphene oxide. Biochem Engin J. 2012; 69: 28-31.
45. Wang Y, Li Z, Wang J, Li J, Lin Y. Graphene and graphene oxide: biofunctionalization and applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2011; 29: 205-212.
46. Zhang C, Luo S, Chen W. Activity of catalase adsorbed to carbon nanotubes: effects of carbon nanotube surface properties. Talanta. 2013; 113: 142-147.
47. Rios NS, Pinheiro BB, Pinheiro MP, Bezerra RM, dos Santos JCS, Gonçalves LRB. Biotechnological potential of lipases from Pseudomonas: sources, properties and applications. Process Biochem. 2018; 75: 99-12.
48. Hausmann NZ, Minteer SD, Baum DA. Controlled placement of enzymes on carbon nanotubes using comb-branched DNA. J Electrochem Soc. 2014; 161: H3001-H3004.
49. Adhikari S. Application of Immobilized Enzymes in the Food Industry. In: Enzymes in Food Biotechnology. Elsevier, 2019; 711-721.
50. Bonnin E, Garnier C, Ralet M-C. Pectin- modifying enzymes and pectin-derived materials: applications and impacts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98: 519-532.
51. Ghosh S, Chaganti SR, Prakasham R. Polyaniline nano-fiber as a novel immobilization matrix for the anti-leukemia enzyme l-asparaginase. J Mol Catalysis B: Enzymatic. 2012; 74: 132-137.
52. Gebreyohannes AY. Bio-hybrid membrane process for food-based wastewater valorisation: a pathway to an efficient integrated membrane process design. Université Paul Sabatier-Toulouse III. 2015, https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01514928.
53. Quazi S. Vaccine in response to COVID-19: Recent developments, challenges, and a way out. Biomed Biotechnol Res J. 2011; 5(2): 105-109.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.